Revisiting Dogville’s Final Scene: “If There’s Any Town This
World Would be Better Without, [Vancouver] is It.”
© 2009 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
Nicole’s film ‘Dogville’ won the Geo Uber-Achievement Award because the political treatise on celluloid both geniusly articulated what it’s been like living under the paradigm of governance of Chinada principals and describing in graphic detail the only solution there is to what they stood for: the death penalty.
The final scene of Nicole’s remarkable portrayal of the Custodian Chief Executive’s life over twenty years and how the coalition back in 2003 wanted to resolve the problematic of the global expansion of fiefdom-totalitarian commu-nazi genocidal racism is now on the Internet:
The fact Chinada principals, financers and operatives failed to heed this threat is a testament to how much they won’t be intimidated from pursuing their global hegemony objective; and thus provides the coalition full justification to employ assassination techniques and empower the ‘Iron Fist’ accountability tribunal with the power to render capital punishment verdicts.
The following is an excerpt from the chapter documenting this powerful and to-this-day applicable coercive diplomacy:
The question she posed after her father offered her the ability to exact retribution for her being enslaved, raped, brutalized and tortured involved was ‘what would happen if the townsfolk weren’t prevented from occasioning on other innocent people what she suffered?’:
Grace: It could happen again. Somebody…somebody happening by; revealing their frailty. That’s what I want to use the power for, if you don’t mind. I want to make this world a little better.
[…]
Grace: If there’s any town this world would be better without, this is it.
Father: [to enforcer] Shoot them. Burn down the town.
The retribution she visits on Dogville’s residents and Tom is the vehicle the coalition uses to describe their sentiments about what happened to the Canadian lawyer and to communicate what they think of the utterly revolting sociopathic character of Canadian leadership. This is coercive diplomacy in action.
[…]
It was hoped in 2004 the coercive messages contained in ‘Dogville’ would be efficacious. They weren’t. Not only did the enslavement, experimentation and torture of the Canadian lawyer continue, the militarized scientific and medical R&D envelope was pushed further and further; and he experienced new and similarly violating intrusions as described in the Svengali chapter. Additionally, Canada’s leaders repeatedly indicated to the coalition they had no intention of abandoning their global hegemony drive with Beijing or reforming Canada’s institutions to become fully democratic.
